All Pathways
Plastic SurgeryEmergency

Flexor Tendon Laceration Assessment and Repair

Flexor Tendon Laceration Assessment and Repair: Suspected Flexor Tendon Laceration → History and Examination → Test FDS Function → Flexor Tendon Zones →...

Pathway Overview

12 steps

Algorithm Steps

12 total

  1. 01Start

    Suspected Flexor Tendon Laceration

    Hand/finger laceration with weakness

  2. 02Action

    History and Examination

    Assess mechanism and function

    • HISTORY:
    • - Mechanism (sharp vs crush)
    • - Time since injury
    • - Hand dominance
    • - Occupation/hobbies
    • EXAMINATION:
    • - Wound location (predict zone)
    • - Active finger flexion
    • - Cascade (resting posture)
    • - Neurovascular status
  3. 03Action

    Test FDS Function

    Flexor digitorum superficialis

    • Hold adjacent fingers in extension
    • Ask patient to flex PIP joint
    • FDS intact: Can flex PIP independently
    • FDS cut: Cannot flex PIP alone
    • Note: Little finger FDS often absent/weak
  4. 04Action

    Flexor Tendon Zones

    Verdan classification

    • ZONE I: Distal to FDS insertion
    • - Only FDP present
    • ZONE II: 'No Man's Land' (A1 pulley to FDS insertion)
    • - FDP + FDS in tight sheath
    • - Historically worst outcomes
    • ZONE III: Palm (lumbrical origin to A1)
    • - FDP + FDS, more space
    • ZONE IV: Carpal tunnel
    • - Tendons + median nerve
    • ZONE V: Wrist to forearm
    • - Muscle-tendon junction
  5. 05Decision

    Partial vs Complete Laceration?

    Affects management

    • <50% transected: May not need repair
    • >50-60% transected: Repair recommended
  6. 06Action

    Partial Laceration (<50%)

    Conservative vs repair

    • Options:
    • - Trim frayed edges, no repair
    • - Epitendinous repair only
    • - Splint and early motion
    • Watch for triggering
    • Repair if >50-60% involved
  7. 07Action

    Postoperative Protocol

    Rehabilitation critical

    • SPLINTING:
    • - Dorsal blocking splint
    • - Wrist 20° flexion, MCP 70° flexion
    • - IP joints extended
    • EARLY MOTION PROTOCOLS:
    • - Passive flexion, active extension
    • - Place and hold (Duran/Kleinert)
    • - True active motion (selected cases)
    • PROGRESSION:
    • - 4-6 weeks: Begin active flexion
    • - 8-12 weeks: Resistance
    • - 3-4 months: Return to activities
  8. 08Action

    Complications

    Watch for

    • RUPTURE: 2-5%
    • - Usually 10-21 days postop
    • - Need revision repair/graft
    • ADHESIONS: Most common
    • - Limits tendon gliding
    • - May need tenolysis
    • STIFFNESS:
    • - PIP contracture common
    • - Therapy essential
    • SWAN NECK (Zone I):
    • - From FDP scarring
  9. 09Outcome

    Outcomes

    Expected results

    • Zone II: 75-90% good/excellent
    • Modern multi-strand repairs improved outcomes
    • Early active motion protocols help
    • Measure: Total active motion (TAM)
    • Excellent: >75% normal TAM
    • Good: 50-75% normal TAM
  10. 10Action

    Timing of Repair

    When to operate

    • PRIMARY (<24h): Ideal if clean
    • DELAYED PRIMARY (1-14 days): Acceptable
    • SECONDARY (>3-4 weeks): More difficult
    • LATE (>6 weeks): May need graft/staged
    • FACTORS:
    • - Wound contamination
    • - Associated injuries
    • - OR availability
  11. 11Action

    Surgical Repair Principles

    Modern technique

    • APPROACH:
    • - Bruner incisions for exposure
    • - Preserve pulleys (especially A2, A4)
    • CORE SUTURE:
    • - Multi-strand technique (4-6 strand)
    • - Stronger = earlier motion
    • - Kessler, Cruciate, Tang techniques
    • EPITENDINOUS SUTURE:
    • - 5-0 or 6-0 running/simple
    • - Smooths repair, adds strength
    • FDS REPAIR:
    • - Zone II: Repair one slip if tight
    • - May excise both slips if needed
  12. Path rejoins step 07Shared downstream outcome
  13. 12Action

    Test FDP Function

    Flexor digitorum profundus

    • Stabilize PIP joint in extension
    • Ask patient to flex DIP joint
    • FDP intact: Can flex DIP
    • FDP cut: Cannot flex DIP
    • Always test thumb FPL separately
  14. Path rejoins step 04Shared downstream outcome

Guideline Source

ASSH Flexor Tendon Repair Guidelines

Clinical Safety Information

Clinical Decision Support — Not a Substitute for Clinical Judgment

Individual patient factors may require deviation from these recommendations.

Known Limitations

  • Zone II ('no man's land') historically difficult
  • Pediatric tendons more challenging
  • FDP vs FDS injury affects strategy
  • Therapy protocol crucial for outcome

Applicable Regions

USEU
Version 1Next review: 2027-01-11

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the Flexor Tendon Laceration Assessment and Repair?

The Flexor Tendon Laceration Assessment and Repair is a emergency clinical algorithm for Plastic Surgery. It provides a structured decision tree to guide clinical decision-making, based on ASSH Flexor Tendon Repair Guidelines.

What guideline is the Flexor Tendon Laceration Assessment and Repair based on?

This algorithm is based on ASSH Flexor Tendon Repair Guidelines (DOI: N/A).

What are the limitations of the Flexor Tendon Laceration Assessment and Repair?

Known limitations include: Zone II ('no man's land') historically difficult; Pediatric tendons more challenging; FDP vs FDS injury affects strategy; Therapy protocol crucial for outcome. Individual patient factors may require deviation from these recommendations.

Get AI-Powered Analysis Alongside This Algorithm

In AttendMe.ai, the Flexor Tendon Laceration Assessment and Repair appears automatically when your clinical question matches — alongside evidence from 3M+ peer-reviewed articles.

Try AttendMe Free