All Pathways
Hepatobiliary SurgeryEmergency

Liver Trauma Management (WSES/AAST 2020)

Liver Trauma Management (WSES/AAST 2020): Liver Trauma → Primary Survey (ATLS) → Hemodynamic Status? → Hemodynamically Unstable → Emergency Laparotomy.

Pathway Overview

14 steps

Algorithm Steps

14 total

  1. 01Start

    Liver Trauma

    Blunt or penetrating injury

  2. 02Action

    Primary Survey (ATLS)

    Immediate assessment

    • Airway, Breathing, Circulation
    • Assess hemodynamic status
    • FAST exam if available
    • Identify life-threatening injuries
    • IV access, type and crossmatch
  3. 03Decision

    Hemodynamic Status?

    Key decision point

    • STABLE: SBP >90, HR <100, responds to fluids
    • UNSTABLE: Persistent hypotension despite resuscitation
  4. 04Warning

    Hemodynamically Unstable

    Immediate intervention required

    • Massive transfusion protocol
    • FAST positive → OR
    • FAST negative → Consider other sources
    • No time for CT
  5. 05Action

    Emergency Laparotomy

    Damage control surgery

    • DAMAGE CONTROL PRINCIPLES:
    • - Packing (most effective)
    • - Direct pressure
    • - Pringle maneuver (hepatic pedicle clamp)
    • - Hepatorrhaphy for lacerations
    • - Resection only if required
    • - Temporary abdominal closure
    • Return to OR in 24-48h when stable
  6. 06Action

    Delayed Complications

    Monitor and manage

    • BILOMA: Percutaneous drainage + ERCP
    • HEMOBILIA: Angioembolization
    • HEPATIC NECROSIS: Debridement if infected
    • ABSCESS: Percutaneous drainage
    • ACS (Abdominal Compartment): Decompression
  7. 07Outcome

    Outcomes

    Prognosis

    • NOM success: >90%
    • Grade I-III: Excellent prognosis
    • Grade IV-V: Higher morbidity
    • Grade VI: Often fatal
    • Overall mortality depends on associated injuries
  8. 08Action

    Hemodynamically Stable

    CT scan for grading

    • CT abdomen/pelvis WITH IV contrast
    • Arterial and portal venous phases
    • Grade injury by AAST scale
    • Look for: Active extravasation, pseudoaneurysm
  9. 09Action

    AAST Liver Injury Scale

    CT-based grading

    • GRADE I: Subcapsular hematoma <10%, laceration <1cm
    • GRADE II: Hematoma 10-50%, laceration 1-3cm
    • GRADE III: Hematoma >50% or ruptured, laceration >3cm
    • GRADE IV: Parenchymal disruption 25-75% of lobe
    • GRADE V: Parenchymal disruption >75%, juxtahepatic venous injury
    • GRADE VI: Hepatic avulsion (often non-survivable)
  10. 10Decision

    Active Extravasation on CT?

    Blush or pseudoaneurysm

  11. 11Action

    Angioembolization

    For active arterial bleeding

    • Hepatic angiography
    • Selective embolization of bleeding vessel
    • Can repeat if needed
    • Adjunct to NOM
    • Success rate: 80-90%
    • Monitor for hepatic necrosis
  12. 12Action

    Non-Operative Management (NOM)

    For stable patients without extravasation

    • CRITERIA FOR NOM:
    • - Hemodynamically stable
    • - No peritonitis
    • - No other indications for laparotomy
    • MONITORING:
    • - ICU for Grade III-V
    • - Serial H&H q6h x 24h
    • - Bed rest initially
    • - Repeat imaging for worsening
    • SUCCESS RATE: >90%
  13. 13Decision

    NOM Failure Signs?

    Indication for intervention

    • Hemodynamic instability
    • Falling H&H despite transfusion
    • Peritonitis
    • Increasing abdominal pain
  14. Path rejoins step 05Shared downstream outcome
  15. Path rejoins step 06Shared downstream outcome
  16. 14Action

    Discharge Planning

    Activity restrictions

    • Grade I-II: 2 weeks rest
    • Grade III: 4-6 weeks rest
    • Grade IV-V: 3 months rest
    • No contact sports until healed
    • Follow-up imaging controversial
    • Return if: Fever, increasing pain, hemodynamic symptoms
  17. Path rejoins step 07Shared downstream outcome
  18. Path rejoins step 12Shared downstream outcome

Guideline Source

WSES/AAST Guidelines for Management of Liver Trauma

Clinical Safety Information

Clinical Decision Support — Not a Substitute for Clinical Judgment

Individual patient factors may require deviation from these recommendations.

Known Limitations

  • CT grading may underestimate injury
  • Delayed complications (biloma, hemobilia) possible
  • Requires experienced trauma center
  • Associated injuries affect management

Applicable Regions

USEU
Version 1Next review: 2027-01-11

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the Liver Trauma Management (WSES/AAST 2020)?

The Liver Trauma Management (WSES/AAST 2020) is a emergency clinical algorithm for Hepatobiliary Surgery. It provides a structured decision tree to guide clinical decision-making, based on WSES/AAST Guidelines for Management of Liver Trauma.

What guideline is the Liver Trauma Management (WSES/AAST 2020) based on?

This algorithm is based on WSES/AAST Guidelines for Management of Liver Trauma (DOI: 10.1186/s13017-020-00302-3).

What are the limitations of the Liver Trauma Management (WSES/AAST 2020)?

Known limitations include: CT grading may underestimate injury; Delayed complications (biloma, hemobilia) possible; Requires experienced trauma center; Associated injuries affect management. Individual patient factors may require deviation from these recommendations.

Get AI-Powered Analysis Alongside This Algorithm

In AttendMe.ai, the Liver Trauma Management (WSES/AAST 2020) appears automatically when your clinical question matches — alongside evidence from 3M+ peer-reviewed articles.

Try AttendMe Free